As
a successor to Executive
Order 11246 which was signed in 1965 by President Lyndon B. Johnson,
President Obama further issued an order with an aim to initiate a government
wide program which encourages inclusion and diversity in the federal
workforce.
With
an aim to reach out to military personnel as well as civilians who are currently
working in a range of agencies, departments and operating environments across
the nation – this particular order is different from the Executive Order 11246
which demands compliance. This particular order demands adherence to the law
without any negotiations.
Is
this another Law?
Technically
speaking, this order isn’t exactly new legal rule. With already a significant
number of laws and protocols in place, this order simply expects comprehensive
consolidation and coordination of efforts that ensure diversity within a
federal work environment.
The
Objective of this Order
The
primary objective of President Obama’s Executive Order is to create a work
environment which facilitates fairness, collaboration and flexibility that
allows a diverse group of people to participate in organizational growth in
their full possible potential.
With
the government’s ability to hire, promote and retain a more diverse workforce,
it also aims to set an example to private sectors where racial prejudices are still
prevalent.
Consider
this simple checklist while taking actions that encourage diverse work
environments –
2. Exhibit communication and learning associated with these behaviors to discourage discriminatory behavior within the workplace.
3. Consider a regulatory rather than a cultural approach where required.
4. Make sure the group leaders within your organization have accepted diversity as an organization culture. Oversee what they say, how they communicate and how they handle issues when they arise.
5. Use training sessions and on the job learning as a tool to inculcate tolerance within your work environment.
To
be able to encourage equal opportunities in a federal work environment, it is
important that the specific behavioral definitions are put in place which does
not result in conflicting interpretations. With a zero-tolerance policy against
workplace discrimination, it is possible for organizations to make a positive
impact on cultural harmony.